Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Notes from Class on 26th

Here are some notes from my meeting with Trevor today:
  • Don't let the setup of the room (in my case B131) limit how I envisage my installation. there are 18 monitors in B131 but this shouldn't limit me. They don't have to be on the desks. Think about different ways that the monitors could be setup.
  • Experiment with using another narrative alongside the piece in order to bring out more meaning and interest. The stations of the Cross were suggested.
  • Still shots can be used as video provided they incorporate the 4th dimension of TIME i.e. they aren't just static images on a screen.

Specifying and Clarifying

I have decided to stick with computer technology alone as my representative of technology in general. Technology is all around us from door handles to kettles however I have decided to focus on computer technology in order to convey the theme of the project. My reasoning behind this is that the range of technology is so vast that it may well confuse the audience by not being specific enough. People link computers with technology and so I think that by using computers My message will be conveyed with greater clarity.

Computer Technology Overview Chart

Here is a link to a chart which tracks the progress of computer technology over the last century or so. This chart is a great visual indicator of the pace of technological change. It is a great reference point for my project as it shows the changes over the years.

Monday, October 25, 2010

Clarifying the theme/aim

As I move onto developing the setup and style of my video installation I realise that I need to clarify my definition of the theme once again. I am sure of the theme - the pace of change of technology - but I need to clarify exactly which aspect of this theme I want to approach. As I have been researching the overall theme I found myself increasingly playing around with the idea of technolgy mutiny. The idea that the technology around us has become embittered to us and that it has a will of its own which is rebelious and independent from us is one that I think is a worthwhile idea to develop to show how the pace of technological change could be ultimately destructive.

Another interesting Blog Post...

Another interesting Blog Post...

"Technology creates change, and the change forces new technology"

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Technology and the elderly

Here is an article that I found via the New York Times which looks at the the devaluation of elderly people by technology. I have highlighted in RED the points which stuck out to me.

Technology reduces the value of old people

Old people have never been as quick or energetic as young people, but societies have often valued them for their accumulated skills, knowledge, and wisdom. The ancient Egyptians considered a person to be truly old at age 80, though Ramesses the Great lived to perhaps 90 or 91 and Pepi II may have lived to 98. In a continuous culture that spanned 3000 years it would be quite reasonable to ask someone born 80 years earlier about best practices in art, agriculture, architecture, construction, or military technology.

What has the increasing pace of technological development done to old people in our age?

Let’s start by considering factual knowledge. An old person will know more than a young person, but can any person, young or old, know as much as Google and Wikipedia? Why would a young person ask an elder the answer to a fact question that can be solved authoritatively in 10 seconds with a Web search?

How about skills? Want help orienting a rooftop television aerial? Changing the vacuum tubes in your TV? Dialing up AOL? Using MS-DOS? Changing the ribbon on an IBM Selectric (height of 1961 technology)? Tuning up a car that lacks electronic engine controls? Doing your taxes without considering the Alternative Minimum Tax and the tens of thousands of pages of rules that have been added since our senior citizen was starting his career? Didn’t think so.

The same technological progress that enables our society to keep an ever-larger percentage of old folks’ bodies going has simultaneously reduced the value of the minds within those bodies. It is sad to contemplate. Perhaps the answer is for every old person to become an expert personal computer and network administrator. Those skills always seem to be in demand by the general public.

Another answer would be to develop obvious wisdom. Unfortunately, the young people who are most in need of an elder’s wisdom are the least likely to realize it. Only a small percentage of old people throughout history have managed to maintain high status and value purely through wisdom. Examples that come to mind include the Buddha (died at 80) and Confucius (died at 72). Their would-be modern counterparts are most likely forwarding cautionary emails to younger relatives about the dangers of opening particularly virulent email messages.

I recently wished a friend a happy birthday. He is in his 50s with a young wife and two-year-old children. All his life he has been valued for and earned his living with musical creativity. Here’s his reply:

I have been declared inept by my household! It only gets worse. You are not judged by your intelligence but by how well you do menial tasks. I have been spiritually castrated. I am a walking corpse. The only freedom is when I write.

Good ideas for maintaining relevance and value in old age would be welcome in the comments section.

Did You Know

This is a well enough known video which chronicles and predicts the impact of technology on humanity.

Did You Know...

Blurb

Here is the piece that I wrote for this module which was the beginning of my idea/concept. It's just the starting point of my work but it's important that I keep it in mind as I continue developing the project.

/////////////////////////////////


The Pace of Technological change



The pace at which technology changes these days can be either frightening or exhilarating. While
one person may view the rate of these changes as a huge leap of positive progress, another might
perceive this progress in a negative light. We all know that technology can make life easier and
better and longer and more pleasant. The question therefore in my opinion is not ‘do we want
things to change for the better? ‘. Everyone agrees on the answer to that. No, the questions we face
are more like this: ‘are we prepared to let technology to carry out this change? How much do we
want technology to do for us? Who is responsible for drawing that line? Are people allowed to resist
technology if they so choose? Is that even possible?’

When technology becomes part of our lives, it inevitably becomes part of who we are. Thus
technology has personal and ethical implications. Perhaps one of the greatest concerns of this rapid
progression is that nobody is really knows what long term effects it will have on society, culture and
the world at large. We are starting to see the descendents of the TV generation: people who have
never been without television. TV has changed the western world and the culture therein. What
then will the next generation grow up to be when it has grown up with smart phones, ipods,
broadband, touch screens, online shopping and international calling?

It doesn’t necessarily have to be a negative answer, but the concern is still justifiable.

An interesting ad...

Here is a great ad that I found. Again, it deals with the idea of technology as it changes and adapts.

Monday, October 18, 2010

Change!

how technology changes us!!


Technology and how it changes

Here is a link to a talk by Kevin Kelly, editor of Wired Magazine. Kevin is a highly regarded expert in the sphere of technological advancement and computer. In this talk Kevin gives his view on how technology evolves and changes over time. Although I wouldn't agree with his comparison between tahcnolocigal change and the evolution with man, I did find it interesting when he mentions at the very start of the talk how he took a digital detox and removed almost all technology from his life. He did this in order to be able to clearly think about the boundaries and uses of technology. For this reason I found this video very helpful to my project.

He's asking the right questions:
-When does technology impede upon my life as opposed to enhancing it?
-Do we need all the technology that we have?
-Does technology ever die or does it just change?
-How do we establish boundaries and parameters in which to use technology?

These questions are central to my project and finding a way to express them in video is my aim.

Experimental Video

Here is where I will be posting some of my research for my Experimental Video module. The topic I will be dealing with in this module is that of 'the pace technological change'. Dealing with this topic in a non-linear way is a challenge. I'm determined not to have end up shooting a documentary style piece or simply trying to point out the obvious. This module is designed to bring out more experimental approaches to video so that's what I have to look for.