- Don't let the setup of the room (in my case B131) limit how I envisage my installation. there are 18 monitors in B131 but this shouldn't limit me. They don't have to be on the desks. Think about different ways that the monitors could be setup.
- Experiment with using another narrative alongside the piece in order to bring out more meaning and interest. The stations of the Cross were suggested.
- Still shots can be used as video provided they incorporate the 4th dimension of TIME i.e. they aren't just static images on a screen.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Notes from Class on 26th
Specifying and Clarifying
Computer Technology Overview Chart
Monday, October 25, 2010
Clarifying the theme/aim
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Technology and the elderly
Here is an article that I found via the New York Times which looks at the the devaluation of elderly people by technology. I have highlighted in RED the points which stuck out to me.
Technology reduces the value of old people
philg - October 29, 2009 @ 11:15 pm
Old people have never been as quick or energetic as young people, but societies have often valued them for their accumulated skills, knowledge, and wisdom. The ancient Egyptians considered a person to be truly old at age 80, though Ramesses the Great lived to perhaps 90 or 91 and Pepi II may have lived to 98. In a continuous culture that spanned 3000 years it would be quite reasonable to ask someone born 80 years earlier about best practices in art, agriculture, architecture, construction, or military technology.
What has the increasing pace of technological development done to old people in our age?
Let’s start by considering factual knowledge. An old person will know more than a young person, but can any person, young or old, know as much as Google and Wikipedia? Why would a young person ask an elder the answer to a fact question that can be solved authoritatively in 10 seconds with a Web search?
How about skills? Want help orienting a rooftop television aerial? Changing the vacuum tubes in your TV? Dialing up AOL? Using MS-DOS? Changing the ribbon on an IBM Selectric (height of 1961 technology)? Tuning up a car that lacks electronic engine controls? Doing your taxes without considering the Alternative Minimum Tax and the tens of thousands of pages of rules that have been added since our senior citizen was starting his career? Didn’t think so.
The same technological progress that enables our society to keep an ever-larger percentage of old folks’ bodies going has simultaneously reduced the value of the minds within those bodies. It is sad to contemplate. Perhaps the answer is for every old person to become an expert personal computer and network administrator. Those skills always seem to be in demand by the general public.
Another answer would be to develop obvious wisdom. Unfortunately, the young people who are most in need of an elder’s wisdom are the least likely to realize it. Only a small percentage of old people throughout history have managed to maintain high status and value purely through wisdom. Examples that come to mind include the Buddha (died at 80) and Confucius (died at 72). Their would-be modern counterparts are most likely forwarding cautionary emails to younger relatives about the dangers of opening particularly virulent email messages.
I recently wished a friend a happy birthday. He is in his 50s with a young wife and two-year-old children. All his life he has been valued for and earned his living with musical creativity. Here’s his reply:
I have been declared inept by my household! It only gets worse. You are not judged by your intelligence but by how well you do menial tasks. I have been spiritually castrated. I am a walking corpse. The only freedom is when I write.
Good ideas for maintaining relevance and value in old age would be welcome in the comments section.
Did You Know
Did You Know...
Blurb
/////////////////////////////////
The Pace of Technological change
The pace at which technology changes these days can be either frightening or exhilarating. While
one person may view the rate of these changes as a huge leap of positive progress, another might
perceive this progress in a negative light. We all know that technology can make life easier and
better and longer and more pleasant. The question therefore in my opinion is not ‘do we want
things to change for the better? ‘. Everyone agrees on the answer to that. No, the questions we face
are more like this: ‘are we prepared to let technology to carry out this change? How much do we
want technology to do for us? Who is responsible for drawing that line? Are people allowed to resist
technology if they so choose? Is that even possible?’
When technology becomes part of our lives, it inevitably becomes part of who we are. Thus
technology has personal and ethical implications. Perhaps one of the greatest concerns of this rapid
progression is that nobody is really knows what long term effects it will have on society, culture and
the world at large. We are starting to see the descendents of the TV generation: people who have
never been without television. TV has changed the western world and the culture therein. What
then will the next generation grow up to be when it has grown up with smart phones, ipods,
broadband, touch screens, online shopping and international calling?
It doesn’t necessarily have to be a negative answer, but the concern is still justifiable.
An interesting ad...
Monday, October 18, 2010
Technology and how it changes
He's asking the right questions:
-When does technology impede upon my life as opposed to enhancing it?
-Do we need all the technology that we have?
-Does technology ever die or does it just change?
-How do we establish boundaries and parameters in which to use technology?
These questions are central to my project and finding a way to express them in video is my aim.